Nazi Germany And The World War I - 1265 Words

The Second World War had changed the future of the world. Almost every county in the world participated in this war. The world divided into two parts and fought each other. The allied powers against the Axis powers. The leader of the axis powers that includes Italy, Japan, and Germany. The Germany were defeated by the British and French in world war one so the new leader of Nazi Germany Adolf Hitler became allies with two countries the fascist Italy and the militarized Japan. At the beginning the whole world didn’t take the new leader of Nazi Germany very seriously, the United States of America did not want to be involved in European matters , and the united kingdom did not thought that the Nazi Germany will start another war because of†¦show more content†¦But because of all that his army force was weakened. Mussolini planned to re-create the Roman Empire, and lead Italy to greatness but in fact, the country was in bad situations, like national poverty and scientific -industrial weakness and resource dearth. On the other hand, in Germany the Nazi party rise to power and the leader was Adolf Hitler. When Nazi party rise to power, Adolf Hitler become the leader of Nazi Germany. Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini share similar ideology, and similar goals. On 22 MAY 1939 the fascist Italy and Nazi Germany signed an agreement known as pact of steel. Pact of steel was a military and political alliance between Nazi Germany and fascist Italy. At the begging the Empire of Japan was part of the agreement but Japan wanted to focus more on the Soviet Union but Italy and Germany wanted to focus on Franc and Britain . Due to the disagreement Japan didn’t join the alliance until September 1940. After the agreement was signed, Mussolini didn’t want to start the war immediately due to his army weakness, he want more time to rearm his military force. But Hitler have another plans. On August 23 1939, Hitler singed a Nonaggression pact with Soviet Union, in

Comparison Of Trifles And The Yellow Wallpaper - 735 Words

Significant Trifles Trifles by Susan Glaspell and â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper† by Charlotte Perkins Gilman are two bodies of work that follow specific events in women’s lives. These particular conflicts highlight the gap in treatment and understanding between men and women in the earlier twentieth century. Within both stories the authors convey the gender roles expected of them and how they are treated when they are seen as stepping out of those roles by speaking out or acting differently. Trifles shows quite clearly the the disconnect in thinking between men and women soon into the story. The ladies support and understand what one goes through when being the homemaker. There is very hard work involved in maintaining the home as well as†¦show more content†¦A clear example of unfair treatment and diminishing the efforts of women can be found in Trifles. It is obvious what men think about them. â€Å"Well, women are used to worrying over trifles† (1158). T his particular line really sets the tone for how women are viewed and and the type of treatment they receive. Every little thing they do, they do with a purpose, they maintain the household, take care of their husbands but men see it as little things that do not matter. They are disrespected and looked down upon for not fulfilling certain duties while men overlook what the purpose for it was in the first place. Gilman also conveys the negative treatment and impact it these roles have. Even a woman’s mental health was not seen as important enough to pay attention to. There is a beautiful shaded lane that runs down there from the arbors, but John has cautioned me not to give way to fancy in the least. He says that with my imaginative power and habit of story-making, a nervous weakness like mine is sure to lead to all manner of excited fancies, and that I ought to use my will and good sense to check the tendency. So I try. (529) The main character’s mental issues are diminished simply because she is a woman. Men see them as highly emotional and irrational and dismiss their feelings based on that. Her husband thinks just because he is a doctor and she is just his wife he knowsShow MoreRelatedThe Story Of An Hour, By The Yellow Wallpaper, And Trifles999 Words   |  4 PagesIn â€Å"The Story of an Hour†, â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper†, and â€Å"Trifles†, the authors all question the institution of marriage through the emerging theme of the oppression of women. In each of these works, women are shown trapped in confining marriages. While marriage is supposed to be seen as one of the most beautiful and perfect sanctities life has to offer, these authors portray it as more of a bittersweet agony that women are forced to endure. Chopin, Gilman, and Glaspell use a combination of symbolism

Is Being Fashionable a Sin Free Essays

â€Å"Don’t Judge a book from it’s cover† is a great phrase, but we do actually Judge appearance first before getting to know people. That first impression helps anywhere, and good knowledge of fashion, and being well groomed really helps. I think it was Marilyn Monroe that said, â€Å"Clothing should be tight enough to show you are a woman, but loose enough to show you are a lady†. We will write a custom essay sample on Is Being Fashionable a Sin? or any similar topic only for you Order Now Words to live by!! I want to tell them that being modest does NOT mean covering yourself in a shapeless denim bag of a dress that hides any last speck of femininity! It is possible to be beautiful, stylish, and modest. A move toward beautiful clothes that are modest and actually make the person look good is always needed in the fashion world. Remaining fashionable is also a status war in itself, because you can only attain the status at which you can personally afford. I find concept of something being â€Å"fashionable† quite puzzling. Why many people feel obliged to wear â€Å"fashionable clothes†? They don’t wear it because of aesthetic value – or do they? If something was fashionable last season and now it is not, does it mean that the aesthetic Judgment changed or do people recognize value in conforming to the majority? The answer is simpler than you think. â€Å"Fashion† is the effect, not the cause. Combine two separate concepts: First, that pleasure resulting from a certain aesthetic fades over time. So yes to your first question, it is the aesthetic value that changes. You can only eat ice cream so long until you get tired of eating it, even though nothing changed about the ice cream. Similarly, people get tired of seeing the same kind of clothes being worn all the time. There is a certain pleasure in novelty. Second, fashion has a social value, as well as an individual one. Socially, what people ear is a significant part of our environment, so it’s more pleasing to see people well- dressed. Individually, to wear clothes that other people find pleasing arouses our vanity, so we have a personal interest in pleasing our society. â€Å"Fashion† refers to this careful equilibrium between social pleasure and individual vanity. It’s more of a sign claiming â€Å"I’m up to date† than any aesthetics, but being up to date is very valued by many people, even if it is about something as irrelevant as clothing and even if being up to date about irrelevant things implies an opportunity cost and earns lost opportunities to be up to date about relevant things. Subconscious thoughts are not characterized for being very deep. TOPIC: People nowadays are paying a lot of attention to fashion. Do you think this is a good thing? As a kind of art, fashion has its own values and benefits for people such as making them more beautiful. Nowadays, people are paying a lot of attention to fashion and I think this is a very good thing because of the following reasons. First, fashion makes people become more attractive. On the roads, a girl dressing in fashionable clothes always attracts more attention of people than one in outdated outfit. This is because as human beings, we all want something that is new and appealing rather than boring. And fashion, in this case, contributes a lot to the beauty of people. It makes them more pretty in apparels that are updated to the popular trends, which a number of people are interested in. Secondly, fashion indirectly builds up a healthy lifestyle. People who love fashion always want to be in the most up-to-date dress. However, these clothes are Just suitable for certain body shape, which is usually a thin one. Therefore, fashion and he love for it are encouraging more and more people to follow a healthful diet, to do exercise and to work out in order to have perfect bodies that are fitted in the clothes they like. Last but not least, fashion makes our world an interesting place to live in. If fashion did not exist, the world might be a dull place where all people wore the same things with the same color. We could never see attractive girls in fashionable clothes on the roads or youthful boy in hip hop costumes. Moreover, no fashion meaner no traditional costume, which is a unique part that differentiates each culture. Therefore, with cushion, people can enjoy a colorful world where everyone looks beautiful and attractive in their own fashion style. In short, I believe that the special attention of people to fashion is reasonable and needed to be encouraged. It is because fashion contributes a lot to better people’s appearance, to create a healthy lifestyle and a colorful world. Fashion is a sword TTT can heal or destroy. Ultimately in today’s age, Fashion Just destroys people’s lives. Fashion as healing: As an art, fashion can bring healing and meaning to people’s lives especially ones who are gifted in designing and have passion for it. As destructive. Too many to describe. Fashion sprung out from man’s perversity to want to dress to impress. To dress to look good so that who benefits? They benefit and feel better about themselves. Look presentable is the goal for most organizations but that has just set a mindset especially in work cultures where dressing good matters. It does really create stratifications and psychological stress on people to dress a certain way if not be ready to meet the Judgment or isolation in some cases. What do these benefit a person when they reflect back upon the impact of fashion in society? Not forgetting what many people above have indicated on fashion’s influence on self esteem and other matters. Fashion like science gives people a reason to have a Job and to feel good about it but it may actually be one of the reasons why people began to sin and erode the societal norms and family unities. Fashion makes people liberal in whatever they want such that they don’t have to care anymore bat people around. Making a statement is bold but a great way to make oneself unique and humans crave that because they need to stand out and make a marquee in the community. They want to feel significant and stand out from the crowd. I’m saying good that you stand out but if the assumptive effect of fashion leads to the detrimental destruction on human unity and communion, then fashion shall be no more than a subtle piece of timber waiting to explode in someone’s lives in some form of cheat or sick way. It really matters how you dress but many people’s lives have been testimonies of the human need to find acceptance and prominence in some way and fashion is really not a good way. Predictability is a fine line between looking good and attention seeking. Conclusion; Fashion destroys pulp’s lives very subtly and slowly if no appropriate boundaries are observed. Any since no one can restrict anyone from wearing anything, the trend is that fashion is one factor that harms our society and its a fact that no one can refute. Fashion here refers to the general consensus that dressing encompasses in our current day where we dress to show rather than to be presentable. That is the case TTT MAJORITY of brands try to proliferate. Sex sells is the message of the day. Just look at most of the biggest companies and you can be sure TTT is one of their drives in the company. Inner beauty not outer fashion ‘For beautiful eyes, look for the good in others; for beautiful lips, speak only words of kindness; and for poise, walk with the knowledge that you are never alone,’ is a famous quote by Audrey Hepburn. Thus it is about the inner beauty not the outer fashion. Lol, thank you can’t think of anything else Self Respect has officially disappeared Women nowadays no longer dress to impress instead they dress to expose. Even though as women we may think that if we dress in a particular way, it would attract a guy we need to remember that if we respect who we are and how we portray ourselves, men will see this and respect us as well. Children as young as 12 are beginning to dress in clothes with a lot of exposure which is a sign that they are growing up. Children need to be children when they have the time and discovering and understanding grown up stuff should be left for their futures ahead. Makes people feel inadequate. Fashion is greedy and kills individuality. We are told that if you wear this or wear that, men will want you, etc. It is a load of rubbish. You can’t Just wear what you want because that isn’t ‘in’ for that year, or month, or even week. Fashion churns out lines from every high street store in the country. Style and creativity (great things) should not be synonymous with fashion This organized fashion world however is something else. A grotesque facet of humanity and offshoot of capitalism, it commodities and homogeneous almost everything on this planet. Ultimately, in order to reproduce the same shallow, greedy hierarchy behind the the finished/contrived products mediated and presented to us. It DOES damage the planet. It DOES kill animals. It DOES cause eating disorders. It DOES cause low self esteem. It fuels competitiveness and ignorance, and an irresponsible denial of reality. It causes us to ignore who we really are, who other people really are and values and issues which can’t be turned into something sexy and desirable. It causes us to overlook the wonderful non-airbrushed world we already live in, and it also causes us to refuse to acknowledge and solve the problems that are there in it. It causes us to rule out knowing entire groups of people, adopting entire ways of thinking. It also – despite its self-proclaimed image of not doing so – continues racism and tethering. For several years I fell into the fashion trap set for all people. Lured in by the glossiness, the perfection, the sex, glamour, the manipulative language and presentation. I looked at the world through fashion’s demeaning gaze and missed out on so much and hurt many people. I hurt my savings! I hurt my development! I wasted time. I hurt myself in developing an eating disorder and not embracing the absolutely wonderful person I already was. I also hurt people close to me, acquaintances, with the inherent Judgment fashion instills. I hurt people all around the world by paying attention to fashion, as fashion is a system relying on the people outside/at the bottom. I also no doubt perpetuated the harsh living standards for those at the bottom of the fashion industry making these clothes. And I damaged the planet. I don’t believe that the meaner meet the ends whatsoever and if fashion was really that great it wouldn’t need the billions and billions spent on constant PR advertising. I think our society is seriously lacking in education/seriously over indoctrinated by the media now if a several million dollar ad which taps into your biological/instinctive yearnings to sell you an unrelated and inanimate object is seen s totally normal and an art form. I would also bring into question fashion houses funding of things which maintain the hierarchy and the concept of ‘cool’ and commodities ‘e. Galleries, shows, films, celebrities, buildings and why Italian fashion houses donate millions to the maintenance of crumbling Italian buildings which fuel the rest of the worlds perception of beautiful Italy etc etc I know there are other issues in play. I wrote this very quickly and it may seem reductive but I’m positive my argument is stronger than those trying to reassure themselves fashion is a necessary art form. It deviates youngsters from studies Youngsters who pay more attention to fashion are less attentive to their studies and when it comes to devoting time to their academic career, they seem to be less concerned. This very attitude and the role of fashion Magazines is harming the very basics of the student community and they start feeling that their life would reach a certain height if they involve their selves in the fashion activities. It is making people’s minds more dependent on material things. It puts this image in your head that its all about how you look and what to wear and tepidity such as that. People are too dependent on what factories and what the government and what industries provide for them, when you can benefit you and your mind set by buying clothes that are for needs, not 50 million shirts to wear because you NEED every dang color. I understand that fashion is a way that people can express themselves, but when you take it too far and make it something you cannot live without, it shows true weakness in you AND society as a whole. Fashion rules the world. How many people do you know that don’t care about the way they dress? I could count mine on one hand. People spend money they don’t even have on clothes they will only wear once or twice at the most. When you spend money you don’t have, your creating a problem for yourself, and others. Once you go broke, you start to have to get help from the government. The government gets it’s money from the taxes and stuff from the people who choose to spend their money the right way. Is it fair either? Fashion is harmful to society It makes you feel not K each season. So in an effort to feel K you pressure yourself to buy. It’s not about creating peace or Joy in one’s, but rather reinforcing you’re not k unless you wear this designer or can afford this fashion. It’s a waste of human resources. Displays the â€Å"perfect† image to viewers This causes them to believe in that image and strive to achieve it in order to feed their need to look beautiful. They try to follow the way that they are shown in the fashion industry which will help them to be accepted and look like the perfect beautiful woman so that they can match the society’s requirements on beauty. Fashion depresses peoples freedom to be an individual Everyone here seems to be talking about clothes, but following fashion is in my mind, owing something that everyone is supposedly doing at the moment whether it be types of clothes, cars, behavior. Basically copying others Just to fit in or gain supposed social recognition. This can be harmful to a persons individuality, self esteem and general happiness if taken so far to stop people feeling they can freely be themselves. They have to follow the fashion no matter what the cost or think it’s k to treat people who don’t follow suit as outcasts. People are too bind to realize what fashion can do to person. I know this from experience and have watched people surfer. Fashion is killing naggers and some adults. Fashion is a waste of time. What happened to people expressing themselves? There are too many people wrapped up in what’s in or getting the next best thing. Also, the so-called fashion of â€Å"hot bodies†; what the hell is up with that? I watched a friend who is so called â€Å"fat and ugly† struggle with being in style and having a body people want to see. She starved herself and made herself throw up Just to fit in. Honestly, I used to be wrapped up in fashion, but my mom made me realize that I don’t need the newest things out there. I don’t need make up as I used to think. My mom showed me how to express myself through everything I do. I thank her for that! I may be only 16 but I know what it used to be like. I don’t care about fashion because being â€Å"in† is showing how low people can be and labeling them as trash, ugly, poor and worse. Fashion is harmful to a society and there is so much more around us. The sad thing is that most of the world is too blind to see it. People think fashion is so important because they always want to look good. Why do people always think fashion is so important? Well that is my question to you! Why is it so important? Why do you have to ooh good for people to like you? Some people in this world think that life is all about fashion! Well its not! Soot all you losers out there who think fashion is the best things in life.. Well stop thinking that. If you don’t stop thinking that then you will grow up to have no friends and will have the worst life ever. So I came here to say fashion is not everything in life and it is harmful to some girls. If girls think that they will be liked if they look good then they will grow up to be lonely and have no friends. So if your one of those people think about al the other important things in life before you go to a party or get dressed up. Young girls are trying to emulate celebrities/models and can’t differentiate the celebrity’s â€Å"public persona† wardrobe from their everyday â€Å"at-home† wardrobe. Young girls look to celebrities and/or models when trying to figure out fashion. They see what is dished out to them from the media or from in-person events. They don’t understand that much of what celebrities wear is worn specifically for the publicity. Some even for shock value Just to get into the forefront of the public eye. They see models with unrealistic body shapes and think that to be beautiful and successful they too have to be unhealthily thin. They don’t know how many models are throwing up the only calories their bodies receive on a daily basis. They don’t understand that celebrities that are dressing in body-hugging clothes and see-through tops are purposefully dressing that way because sex sells. Girls are so obsessed with being popular and accepted that they are trying to bypass being a girl and instead are trying to rush into being a woman. They aren’t even getting the chance to figure out for themselves the stupidity of celebrities who spend a good sum of money walking in 9†³ stilettos or shoes without heels all for the sake of publicity. It is obvious that the celebrity is Just hiding behind the same insecurity that the little girls have about being accepted and loved for who they are. For the record, people with real talent do not need to hide behind the facade of fashion absurdity. At schools, girls have started to rank themselves with fashion. Girls have started to decided who’s who by what they wear, and if one doesn’t have enough money to buy a certain piece of clothing, then see it being worn around schools, than their self-esteems can be lowered to a certain degree, and can be seen as a target to bullies, making the situation worse. I feel that fashion is harmful to society, because it promotes a culture that is based solely on appearance. The fashion industry encourages an unrealistic outlook for men and women in regards to their bodies and their looks. Women and men have gone to great extremes to mold their bodies into what the fashion world has decided is â€Å"perfect†, often disregarding their health and well-being, Just to look like the air-brushed, rail-thin models that the industry has deemed beautiful. Fashion is definitely harmful to society, because it inspires people to make potentially harmful lifestyle choices. Societal problems, such as anorexia and teen violence, are exemplary as to why fashion can actually be harmful. The media pushes the idea of beauty, as it is associated with apparently emaciated super models and punks wearing baggy pants and chains. Our children try to emulate what they are seeing on television. Some restrict their eating to the point that their health suffers, and others steal and even resort to violence to obtain clothes that look like those their television heroes wear. Fashion contributes to excluding certain individuals from society by labeling them as different. Fashion meaner being able to express oneself, but when an individual does not have access to fashionable clothes for financial reasons or cultural ones, this individual is generally excluded from society. Fashion contributes in directing our attention towards appearances, and it impacts in a negative way what people think of each other. It harms the environment, it promotes low paid work, an unhealthy self-image and futility and contributes to the increase of consumerism. Most clothes are made with processes that pollute the atmosphere and water sources, produce CO and other harmful gas, and a lot of waste. Most of the clothes are made y people who are paid around 12 cents a day and work in very poor conditions. The fashion industry employs models who are too thin and present their bodies as desirable and normal – how your body should be. And because the magazines, ads and whatnot make the clothes – and the whole industry – look so glamorous, people then feel tempted to buy more and more. This way, our society is becoming more image-centered, more futile and consuming. The fashion industry can be harmful to society, due to its unnatural display of weight requirements. In recent years, the alarming trend of fashion models’ unnatural weight acquirement has directly affected our society, both as consumers and as individuals dealing with self-esteem issues that turn into dangerous health conditions. Teen and preteen girls are especially susceptible to the trends that the â€Å"houses of fashion† determine are â€Å"in†. Fashion is harmful to society for several reasons and it shouldn’t be taken as seriously. Fashion is harmful to society because it makes people feel like they have to dress like the models and worst of all have to be the same size as the models. Children get shunned at school because of fashion and not wearing the top labels of clothing. It is unfair to Judge on fashion but that is what we do most of the time. I believe fashion is harmful to society. As the mother of a thirteen year old girl I can tell you that many things that are considered fashionable are ruining society. Whether it be the way they are wearing their clothes or what. There are also other issues that fall into this category television shows and radio. What is acceptable and what isn’t? It is all a very thin line but all of it is becoming our undoing. Fashion is not harmful to society as it simply personifies freedom Fashion allows people to express themselves in an individual way. It provides diversity in society which can only be a healthy thing. It shows that people have freedom and therefore allows them to relax and feel comfortable for who they are. Overall it makes for happier individuals which results in a more prosperous society. Fashion is the reason so many people are up to their neck in credit card debt. How many times do you go to a department store and not get asked by the cashier if you want a charge card for that store. The answer is almost never. Not only will the store charge you $100 for that pair of Sears, they will let you pay more than that if you onto want to pay for it all right now. Fashion is the biggest scam in consumer product because their products are never worth what you have to pay to be fashionable. Fashion beautifies the society There is nothing wrong with the fashion around us. Its Just our perspective that needs to looked upon and changed regarding fashion. Fashion is all around us so we can’t imagine a society without fashion. It would Just look like a prehistoric society without fashion. Fashion is the result of the man,s mental development, so there is nothing wrong with it. How to cite Is Being Fashionable a Sin?, Papers

Sugnificant Roles in the Transatlantic Slave Trade free essay sample

Significant Roles in the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Throughout the history of the world, there have been many countries and nations that have impacted and influenced the industry of the slave trade. The Transatlantic Slave Trade, in particular, had a very evident effect on the development of the history of society and humanity of the world. Spain was a nation that set the example of being the first European nation to abolish slavery, France believed slavery was the key to success and Britain was responsible for the transportation of millions of slaves.All three countries laded a very important role in the slavery and transatlantic slave trade. Although there were many nations heavily involved in this catastrophe, there was one country that was the foundation Of it all. Portugal was a powerful nation that influenced and stimulated slave trade amongst Europe through the authorization of Dumb;Dividers, the exploration of Western Africa and the establishment of the Triangular Trade. The slave trade is relevant to the transatlantic trading patterns which were established by many European nations as early as the mid-17th century.Trading ships would travel from Europe with intentions to trade manufactured goods to the West Coast of Africa for African slaves. It is estimated that approximately twelve million African slaves crossed the Atlantic Ocean on ships be;en the 1 6th century and 1 9th century. L African and African-American scholars often refer to the slave trade as Mafia which great disaster in the Swahili language. Other scholars also refer to this calamity as the African Holocaust or Holocaust of Enslavement. 2 The Portuguese had a large impact on the issue. Fanons V of Portugal authorized slavery for the first time in his country in the year of 1452.The grandfather of Fanons V, John I of Portugal, influenced this idea before Fanons V was even born. John had aimed to control navigation of the African coast in 1415 when he made the siege and conquest of the city of Acute. 3 All along, the desire for control of the African coast has been present in the Portuguese power. After all, Portugal was the nation who had the most significant role in the transatlantic slave trade. Along with everything that Portugal had accomplished, Spain was another European nation that played a great role in the slave trade as they were the first European nation to use African slaves in he New World.In 1502, two of Spains critical leaders, Ferdinand and Isabella, gave the colonists of the Caribbean permission to import African slaves but the Spanish population in the New World at the time was far too low to implement all of the work needed to support the economi c growth of the Spanish colonies. Within the first couple of years of Spanish presence in the Americas, a shortage Of labor was caused by an outbreak of a tropical epidemic flu. The Native American population decreased as the outbreak spread throughout the land and Spanish colonists became more interested in he slave trade as the demand for labor increased. The first African slaves arrived by shipment to the New World in 1501. 5 Despite the fact that Spain was the first country to use African slaves in the New World, they were also the first country to abolish slavery and the use of slaves in their colonies. The Spanish Emperor, Charles V, felt that through the arguments of the theologizes and jurists, that slavery was a condemnation and an unjust act.In 1 542, Spain was the first country to abolish slavery which set an example and influenced European nations greatly. Going back ninety years, in 1452, the papal bull Dumb-Dividers had a great effect on the slave trade as it was introduced to Portugal for the first ti me. The Dumb-Dividers was a formal proclamation issued by Pope Nicholas V which allowed Fanons V of Portugal, the King of Portugal who reigned from 1438-1 4776, to condemn any Saracens, pagans or unbelievers and enemies of Christ to hereditary slavery.An excerpt from the Dunn-Dividers reads: Mel grant you [Kings of Spain and Portugal] by these present documents, with our Apostolic Authority, full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens ND pagans and any Other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be, as well as their kingdoms, duchies, counties, principalities, and other property and to reduce their persons into perpetual slavery. 7 In Portugal, a Saracen is one who is of the Muslim church and a pagan is a person who holds different religious beliefs than the majority of the population.These people were frowned upon in Portugal along with the people who did not believe in Christ. The Dumb Dividers had a significant effect on the slave trade within Portugal because it gave Fanons V the right to enslave citizens in his entry that did not meet his standards and criteria. Slavery first began in the country of Portugal with the enslavement of Saracens and pagans but soon spread throughout the rest of the world as slaves were traded internationally. The fact that Pope Nicholas V granted this permission to Fanons V of Portugal influenced the rest of Europe significantly. The Pope has a huge influence over the population and whatsoever he says or proclaims, becomes the rule and law. Since the Pope introduced the Dumb-Dividers to Portugal, they believed that slavery was legitimate and this gave justification to the people. The institution of the Dumb-Dividers through Portugal had a vast effect on the slave trade of the world. France was another nation that was very actively involved in the transatlantic slave trade. France participated in the slave trade far more vigorously than most countries in Europe.In the 17th century, the French government desired to promote plantations in the French colonies of the West Indies. In order to do this, the French borrowed money, technology and slaves from the Dutch to enhance their sugar plantations. By 1 670, the French had established about 300 sugar estates. Realizing that slaves were the key to their success, they monopolized the sugar market. Slave population in the 17th century were quite low for French colonies however in the early 1 asss, slave trade boomed under the French flag.France used four times as many slaves as the Americans did and they treated these slaves with much more brutality and cruelty. 9 During the 18th century, over 1400 slave ships left the west coast port to Africa to collect African slaves. Even after the end of slavery in 1818, approximately 500 French trade ships continued to illegally trade African slaves. Not only did the French treat the slaves more harshly than the Americans, they also had a head start in the slave trade and continued it until 1830 many years after the rest of Europe had abolished it In total, about 1 , 250,000 Africans were enslaved by the French. 1 France was a nation heavily involved in the slave trade however, they did not have a significant role comparable to Portugal. Although France was heavily involved in slavery, the Portuguese were the first Europeans to widely explore the African coast. Prince Henry the Navigator was an important Portuguese leader who influenced early European exploration and maritime trade with many other continents. He initiated the search and exploration of the West African coast and in result of his efforts; by the year Of 1460, the Portuguese had discovered the Coast of Africa all the way to Sierra Leon. 2 The Portuguese were searching for grain and gold and Prince Henry the navigator knew they would find some amid the coast of Western Africa. The goal of the Portuguese was to establish a stable and strong trading relationship with the African society, not to colonize their land. The intentions of Prince Henry the Navigator were attained and elation with African society were formed. Trade within the coast of West Africa included trade of cowry shells and hardware in exchange for gold, slaves and ivory. 13 The Portuguese then built establishments that were used as commercial trading posts.The use of these commercial trading posts helped to increase the slave trade throughout the world. Without these initial intentions to explore the Western coast of Africa, the slave trade would have been suspended until another nation had the determination to go out and make a relationship with African society. That being said, the Portuguese had very significant role in the transatlantic slave trade. Although Portugal was a huge role of the transatlantic slave trade, Britain was another European nation that was seriously engaged in the affair.The most significant role that the British had in the slave trade was the transportation of the majority of the slaves. The British ships had a tremendous responsibility in the role Britain took upon them. British slave trade ship owners made 20-50% profit on each voyage. 14 Captain John Hawkins was the first known British man to embark in a voyage across the Atlantic to capture African slaves. Over the course of six years, he made three voyages and captured 1200 Africans and sold them to Spanish colonies in the Americas for goods. 5 From then on, British traders supplied and transported slaves for the Spanish and Portuguese colonists in America. According to Professor David Richardson, British ships carried 3. 4 million or more African slaves to America. 16 In the 18th century, slave trade was the richest part of trade for Britain and many wealthy British traders built mansions, established banks and funded new industries. Britain became a very wealthy nation and profited a lot of money in the process. The transatlantic slave trade benefited Britain positively and helped to promote their strong, durable ships.Furthermore, one of the most indicative reasons Portugal had such a huge role in the slave trade was due to their establishment of the Triangular Trade. Triangular Trade was a system of trading that was commonly used all throughout Europe for slave trade. The trade system had three stages. The first stage involved the production of European goods that would later be sent to Africa. Goods such as cloth, spirit, tobacco, beads, cowry shells, metal goods and guns were all traded in exchange for African slaves. 7 The guns were traded because they were worth a lot more and this helped to obtain more slaves.Eventually, the guns were being used against the European colonists so the exchange of guns was brought to an end. The second stage involved the shipping of the slaves to the Americas through the Middle Passage. The Middle Passage was the journey across the Atlantic Ocean from West Africa to the Americas. Lastly, the final stage of the Triangular Trade was the return to European nations of the finalized products from the slave- labor plantations. Products such as cotton, sugar, tobacco, molasses and um were all brought back to Europe as a result of the hard labor of the slaves. The Triangular Trade system was used for all nations that were involved in the slave trade. It was the most resourceful and effective system of international trade. The Portuguese set up factories and commercial trading posts off the coast of Western Africa. This was essential for the first stage of Triangular Trade because they were ready for when European goods arrived at the African port waiting to be traded for slaves. In brief, Portugal set the world-wide slave trade in motion by introducing and establishing the Triangular Trade.All things considered, Portugal was responsible for the authorization of the Dumb-Dividers, the exploration of Western Africa and the establishment of the Triangular Trade which gave them the most significant role in the slave trade. For hundreds of years, Portugal made it their goal to monopolize the export of slaves from Africa. After four and a half centuries of the Transatlantic Slave Trade, it is estimated that Portugal was responsible for transporting over 4. 5 million African slaves to the Americas, which is roughly 40% of the total of African slaves transported from European nations in general . 8 The reincarnations slave trade will always be a major part of the world and development of history.

Bruce Lee Essay Research Paper Hello and free essay sample

Bruce Lee Essay, Research Paper Hello and welcome to the one-year soldierly humanistic disciplines convention of 1974. As complete soldierly creative persons, we have traveled worldwide here to larn from eachother for the promotion of soldierly humanistic disciplines as an art signifier and life style. As an histrion, soldierly creative person, and father, Mr. Bruce Lee was to talk to us today on soldierly humanistic disciplines and the impact it had had on his life. Bruce Lee could kick three power boots in a 2nd. He could plug as fast you blink your oculus. He trained for 12 hours a twenty-four hours. He did push-ups on one arm on a little finger and could bench-press over 400 lbs. But you every bit good as I know that a true soldierly creative person s abilities are doggedness, force of will. What genuinely made Bruce Lee an creative person was his doctrine and dedication to the humanistic disciplines. We will write a custom essay sample on Bruce Lee Essay Research Paper Hello and or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In an interview with Mr. Lee several old ages before his decease, he said that soldierly humanistic disciplines had a deep significance in his life. That all that he had learned about himself, about the universe, and about life stemmed from soldierly humanistic disciplines. Though many of us know what he is speaking about, few of us know the extent of it. Soldierly Humanistic disciplines fueled Bruce s life force. You could see it in his walk and the expression in his eyes. You could experience it when you talked to him. He was no ordinary adult male, and his unfortunate decease last twelvemonth was something that many of us couldn t understand. The paramount realisation that Mr. Lee gained from his life in the humanistic disciplines was something we all seek and few discovery. The truth of yourself. He described all cognition as self-knowledge, and said that when he taught soldierly humanistic disciplines, what he was truly learning others was how to show themselves. Through the combatitive humanistic disciplines, he, in kernel, found himself, and tried to demo others the beauty of cognizing who you are and what you can go through soldierly humanistic disciplines. He believed that you should non develop under anyone s manner but your ain. Bruce discovered this when he saw he was surrounded by worlds but was himself a automaton, non inquiring, What would Bruce Lee make? Soldierly Humanistic disciplines in all entirety brought Bruce Lee enlightenment. He understood the simple thought that the lone manner to truly unrecorded life is to accept life, and live in the now. If you realize things in their truth, unfettered by desire and penchant, you see the simpleness of it. If you realize people in their truth, without hatred, so you realize their humanity. If you realize yourself in its truth, through self-expression, so you understand life itself. After I m done speech production, Mrs. Linda Lee will come up to the dais to give her words on her late hubby. But before I go, listen to this quotation mark from the small firedrake himself. The purpose of art is to project an interior vision into the universe, to province in aesthetic creative activity the deepest psychic and personal experiences of a human being. It is to enable those experiences to be apprehensible and by and large recognized within the entire model of an ideal universe.

Enzymes Essays (567 words) - Metabolism, Enzymes, Catalysis

Enzymes Essays (567 words) - Metabolism, Enzymes, Catalysis Enzymes Competitive Inhibition competitive inhibition. Fake substrates competing with real substrates for the opportunity to bind at an active site (hence the name competitive) slows or stops enzyme function. Fake substrates look like real substrates to an enzyme's active site; they are, in essence, 'look-a-likes. Competitive inhibitors bind the active site of an enzyme, preventing a real substrate from binding and a product from being formed. Competitive Inhibition Competitive inhibition can be overcome by addition of substrate, which increases an enzyme's chance of finding real substrate. Competitive Inhibition EXAMPLES Sildenafil (Viagra) Nitric Oxide (NO) binds receptors in the smooth muscle cells of the penis. This results in increased levels of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) which increases vasodilation. An enzyme called PDE5 degrades cGMP. Sildenafil fits into the same active site of PDE5 as cGMP, thus competitively inhibiting PDE5 from working. Competitive Inhibition competitive inhibition. Fake substrates competing with real substrates for the opportunity to bind at an active site (hence the name competitive) slows or stops enzyme function. Fake substrates look like real substrates to an enzyme's active site; they are, in essence, 'look-a-likes. Competitive inhibitors bind the active site of an enzyme, preventing a real substrate from binding and a product from being formed. Competitive Inhibition Competitive inhibition can be overcome by addition of substrate, which increases an enzyme's chance of finding real substrate. Competitive Inhibition EXAMPLES Sildenafil (Viagra) Nitric Oxide (NO) binds receptors in the smooth muscle cells of the penis. This results in increased levels of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) which increases vasodilation. An enzyme called PDE5 degrades cGMP. Sildenafil fits into the same active site of PDE5 as cGMP, thus competitively inhibiting PDE5 from working. Competitive Inhibition EXAMPLES Cyanide Cyanide acts as competitive inhibitor to the enzyme cytochrome c oxidase. This prevents the electron transport chain (the last part of cellular respiration) from working, meaning that the cell can no longer produce ATP for energy. Tissues that depend heavily on energy (the CNS and heart) are particularly affected. Non-competitive Inhibitor Non-competitive inhibitors dont attach to the active site of the enzyme but somewhere else on the enzyme. They alter the shape of the enzyme molecule in such a way that the active site changes its shape, making the active site no longer able to accommodate the substrate. Non-competitive Inhibitor EXAMPLES Strychnine Is a colorless highly toxic alkaloid that causes muscular convulsions and eventual death through asphyxia. Strychnine binds to glycine receptors preventing glycine (an inhibitory neurotransmitter) from binding. This causes motor neurons to continuously fire, and the victim has constant muscle contractions. Commonly used in the baits of animal traps, these have been replaced recently with chemicals less toxic to humans. There is no known antidote. Non-competitive Inhibitor EXAMPLES Penicillin Many antibiotics acts as allosteric inhibitors. Penicillin acts by binding to the bacterial enzyme DD-transpeptidase. The bacteria uses this enzyme to catalyze the formation of peptidoglycan cross-links in its cell wall. Without this enzyme it can no longer make new cross-links, all the while continuing to make enzymes that hydrolyze (break-down) these links. This will cause holes in the cell wall to form and eventually force the bacteria to shed most if not all of its wall. Bibliography 1- Inhibitions. (2013, August 14). Retrieved November 26, 2015, from biologyforlife.com/uploads/2/2/3/9/22392738/inhibitors.pdf 2-Turtle, E. (2012, October 6). Biology-Innovation. Retrieved November 26, 2015, from biology-innovation.co.uk/pages/biochemistry/enzymes/

Elect any two countries and using the academic literature examine the Essay

Elect any two countries and using the academic literature examine the impact of cultural differences on the negotiation process - Essay Example Hofstede’s Cultural Typology Hofstede’s cultural dimension theory is beneficial in understanding cross-cultural communication processes and the influence of cultural differences. Hofstede found his theory beneficial for developing a model, which ranks one country against the other, on the basis of four dimensions of culture, i.e. power distance, individualism, masculinity/femininity and uncertainty avoidance (Hofstede, 1984). Culture Difference between United Kingdom and Australia Power Distance The society of United Kingdom is supportive of equality within the society and considers each human being or native of the country as equal. These results reflect that United Kingdom’s society has transformed from the typical old times society into a modern one, which believes that individual rights should not be limitedly granted to few fortunate individuals of the society, but fair play should prevail in every aspect of life. Australian society, on the other hand, is fo und to be a little bit more supportive of equality in the society, as compare to United Kingdom. Australian culture provides each individual with equal opportunities to make their lifestyles better, no matter if the individuals belong to black or white community and they immigrants or civilian of the country (Hofstede, 2012). Individualism By analyzing UK’s society utilizing Hofstede’s typology, it is found that the society is highly supportive of individualism and takes care of each other’s privacy. Individuals are empowered to take decisions about their lives, career and education on their own, and the outcome of their actions is their own responsibility. Moreover, individuals are also supported to live their life in a way, which is considered as a positive contributor towards the overall social structure of the society. When the culture of Australia was analyzed against UK’s culture on the basis of individualism, it was found that Australia’s so cial structure and culture design are more supportive of individualism as compare to United Kingdom (Hofstede, 2012). Masculinity/ Femininity The society of United Kingdom is highly supportive of masculinity and individuals who are highly successful, ambitious and positive are usually considered as the one who drives the society towards positive attitude. On the other hand, Australian society is also femininity oriented, where individuals’ attitude towards life and their contribution to the society are measured from how successful and ambitious they are about their career and job related performance (Hofstede, 2012). Uncertainty Avoidance In this dimension, the society of UK is found to be more supportive of positive attitude and they always perceive that the future is going to bring for them happiness and fortune. Individuals living within the society are hopeful that their present and future would bring hope. Moreover, it also implies that the social structure of UK allows its individuals to keep their plans for the future and present flexible, as it can be altered according to changing scenarios and incoming new information. This is the reason, that UK’s society is supportive of fair play and equal opportunities for every individual in the society. On the other hand, Australian society is more uncertain about the future and reflects a slightly negative attitude in their daily life practices. They are scared of what might

HIS 101 MOD 3 CA Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

HIS 101 MOD 3 CA - Essay Example Change is considered to be a phenomenon which is continuous and is bound to continue so long there is life on earth and time variation. Change is a social setting result in the difference in way of social lives and the social phenomena is exhibited constantly. This is so since the society continually experiences civilization and changes in telecommunication and technology and the ways of living. It is evident that human society is wholly governed with values, ethics and rules in every human activity. Therefore, the pattern of response to the changes is what interests the study of technology and social change. Social change is the social institutions and culture throughout time. Social change is usually brought about by a collection of behaviors (Kendall 2004). Since the mobile phone has been widely adopted as a tool for entertainment and communication, this has led to the revolutionization of the society and the redefinition of patterns of social relationships and contacts among individuals. The mobile phones have succeeded in the transformation of daily life of different and many individuals to a great extent that the technology is considered as an agent of social change. Since it is a personalized device, this has made it possible to provide individuals with greater personal freedom. In addition, the mobile technology has distorted the boundary that existed between public and personal life. Besides being used as communication device, the mobile phone is also considered as a fashion tool which has shaped people’s prestige and identity thus resulting to the creation of a subcultur e especially in adolescents. Mobile phones have been used largely to promote social change. Since early 1990s, Information Communication Technology (ICT) has been considered to be the powerful tools in strengthening the impacts of the development

Answer the 4 questions at the end of the case study

Answer the 4 questions at the end of the - Case Study Example It is evident from the report of McGowan (2004) that putting denial of market access for Mexico is unjustified due to the fact that other countries like fishing agencies of Costa Rica and Ecuador and even USA are also purse seine method to catch tuna; therefore only increasing world demand as the United States was not integrating with a particular market. Figure 1 illustrates the negative impacts to supply and demand that the imposition of an embargo imposes. Figure 1 Imposing embargo not only created trade barriers for Mexico but also caused a loss of millions of dollars for the countries involved in the dispute. It is evident from the argument of McGowan (2004) that fishermen of Mexico use purse seine methods due to non availability of alternatives; alternatives which ultimately could have saved the life of dolphins. Within such a context, a consideration of the research work of Porter (2006) reveals the fact that USA should provide knowledge and resource support to Mexico fisherme n in order to encourage the use of alternate fishing methods; instead of purse seine nets. Porter (2006) found that using purse seine nets can cause serious damage to aquatic eco-system and might even increase death threats for dolphins. However, fishermen in Eastern Tropical Pacific (ETP) still using purse seine nets which are posing death threat for dolphins. ... Question 2: Did the U.S. denial of market access ultimately work? Answer: The U.S. imposed a denial of market access for tuna imports from countries like Mexico, Costa Rica and Ecuador which were known to use purse seine nets. Recently, the USA and Mexico have both appealed to World Trade Organization (WTO) regarding favoritism in tuna exportation (United States Trade Representative, 2012). Mexico subsequently challenged the U.S. denial by stating that fishermen of the USA are also using purse seine nets to catch tuna. In 1992, after the meeting between USA representatives of countries whose market access was denied by U.S, Dolphin safety panels were installed in most of the nets. As could easily have been predicted, the United States denial of market access had both positive and negative impacts. Firstly, it allowed the partner nations to lose a great deal of business revenue and merely shifted the supply and demand curve for tuna throughout the regional and global markets. Secondly , it can be stated to have had a positive impact due to the fact that the United States and partner nations realized that this trade dispute was having negative impacts upon their own respective economies; thereby encouraging them to address the issue and seek to improve tuna fishing technology to better safeguard the plight of the dolphins. Due to such measures, dolphin mortality rate was decreased significantly between1986 to 1998. Figure 2: Decrease in Total Dolphin Death (Source: Czinkota & Ronkainen, 2002) However, U.S denial of market access cannot be classified as only factor behind the sharp decrease in dolphin’s mortality rate because coagulation of other

Sources of news in the Media

Sources of news in the Media The evolution of the news media has presented an interesting tale to be told over the last several hundred years, and the changes have become more abundant over the last two decades with the advent of new technology and ways of reporting. Getting news and special interest stories to the American public has always been the top priority of the news media, but over the last several years, the way of doing so has evolved tremendously. There are several ways of getting the news to the public, among them television, radio, internet, satellite radio, newspapers, magazines, and even cell phones. The news world is far different today than it was a century ago, and things are on their way to changing even more. People have interacted with the news since the beginning of news media. The printed word was the first incarnation of news media. Newspapers and different forms of propaganda were widespread ever since the written word came into existence. However, with the invention of the printing press (Kreis, 2000), the printed word became more and more commonplace. Before long, learning to read and write became a priority for the learning processes of children all over the world and education became a major part of a childs life. Once the printing press was commonplace, the act of publishing newspapers became an everyday occurrence. At first, reading newspapers and books was something reserved for the economically and social elite. However, with advances in education and more and more people in the states becoming literate, people began to read newspapers. With the freedom of the press instilled into the United States Bill of Rights, the press began covering subjects that was at one time off limits, such as religion, government, politics, and other sensitive material. Editorial pages began appearing and people began writing letters to the papers, voicing their opinions and trying to be heard. In the early 1900s, the invention of the radio became a major player in the world of news and the press. News reporters began covering stories and events, and for the first time, people were able to hear major history making news stories within 24 hours of the events actually happening, and sometimes even live in real time. One particular impact of radio was noticed in the audio recording provided by reporter Herbert Morrison at the scene of the Hindenburg disaster on May 6, 1937 (Widner, 2008). The day after the disaster in New Jersey, the recording of Mr. Morrison covering the explosion of the giant zeppelin was broadcast on NBC and several other major news networks. In those days, most of the large radio stations never broadcast recorded material and preferred to be all live, all the time when broadcasting the news. This was one of the few exceptions of that rule. Morrisons broadcast went down in history as one of the most famous ever recorded and has been referred to millions of times since. In the 1940s and 1950s, a new invention called television opened up the possibilities of better news coverage. The evening news became a staple in homes across America, especially once the country made its way into the 1960s, when most households in America had finally purchased a television set. People around America had a visual news source, and in addition to radio, newspapers, and such newspapers as Time and Life, America now had several great ways to keep up with news both locally and abroad. Aside from television going to colour, the news and the way people engaged it maintained its status quo for several years. The next big change came in 1980, when Atlanta businessman Ted Turner founded the Cable News Network (CNN), the first ever twenty four hour cable news station. This dramatically changed the landscape of broadcast journalism, and forced the evening news programs to step up their efforts to keep viewers, especially since the American public no longer had to wait until six o clock at night to catch the latest news. This also hurt newspapers to a small extent, who had to look for other ways to entertain, as well as inform in the growing competitiveness of the news market. In the 1990s, the broadcast journalism market grew by leaps and bounds. Along with several new cable news channels such as MSNBC, Fox News Channel, and business networks such as CNBC, the American public was also introduced to a new medium: the internet. The internet made its major impact on journalism with a story involving President Bill Clinton. On January 17, 1998, internet writer Matt Drudge obtained the information that Newsweek was on the verge of reporting that the President Bill Clinton had had an extramarital affair with a White House intern but had scrapped the story (Whitworth, 2008). He posted it on the internet, and the next day supplied the womans name. That woman was Monica Lewinsky, and the story grew into quite possibly the biggest bombshell in Presidential history. This story also started a major trend of breaking news hitting the internet first before any other source and made way for internet journalism. After the Lewinsky scandal broke, it became commonplace for the internet to be the grounds on which to break sensational stories without risking the consequences of being wrong on national television. Over the next decade and up to present day, national news networks, newspapers, and several other news outlets used the internet more and more extensively in their research and work. The internet was also a place free of censorship, and reporters could get away with a lot more on their own personal web pages as opposed to working for a big corporate news outlet. Over the last several years, more and more people are getting into the journalism business, often putting their amateur skills to work on their own and not relying on an employer. In ways, this has both helped and hurt the media, but the final impact of this trend will not be seen for some time. News media has come a long way since the first newspapers were printed on the press over two hundred years ago. Now, nearly any American can access any news they want with a few mouse clicks and the push of a button. The radio, television, and the internet all now offer 24 hour, around the clock live news coverage and have made all media accessible to anyone. The convenience is there, but with so many sources, it now becomes an issue of credibility. How does one know that their source is correct and who to believe? Only through hard work, research, and a keen eye and ear can todays journalists and readers alike engage the news and get the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. That is the price of todays journalism environment. References Kreis, Steven, 2000. The Printing Press, The History Guide website, http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/press.html, retrieved July 27, 2008. Widner, James F., 2008. Hindenburg Disaster, http://www.otr.com/hindenburg.shtml, retrieved July 28, 2008. Hughes, Lain, 2004. The New Georgia Encyclopedia, http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/nge/Article.jsp?id=h-2643, retrieved July 29, 2008. Whitworth, Damian. 2008. Oral History: The Monica Lewinsky Scandal Ten Years On. Times Online http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/relationships/article3185449.ece, retrieved July 28, 2008.

The Manifestation of Pride in The Great Divorce by C.S. Lewis Essay

The Manifestation of Pride in The Great Divorce by C.S. Lewis The Great Divorce by C.S. Lewis suggests that choices made on earth have a consequential effect towards our acceptance into heaven or our plummet into hell. In this book pride manifests itself in a hundred subtle ways as souls whine about perceived injustices or irrational motives. Thankfully, a few tourists do humble themselves, become transformed into marvelously real beings, and remain in heaven. But most don't, about which the great Scottish author George MacDonald, Lewis' heavenly guide, says, â€Å"They may not be rejecting the truth of heaven now. They may be reenacting the rejection they made while on earth†. George MacDonald the narrator/teacher, from whom Lewis found inspiration for his book, is the guide in the journey through the gates of heaven. This provides great wisdom throughout the book which is not understood without reflection. MacDonald in essence presents Lewis with a choice while journeying in the gates of heaven. The stories of lost ghosts in the heavenly gates only provide reflection for Lewis’ own choice. This choice is not revealed by Lewis, rather it is up to the reader to make his/her own choice. MacDonald gives guidance towards our choice, â€Å"The choice of every lost soul can be expressed in the words, ‘Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.’ There is always something they prefer to joy....† (71). At one point in the book McDonald observes a ghost with Lewis and suggests that truth is a lifelong process, our life longs for this truth. Although we may not all realize truth because of lack of time, Lewis suggests it’s just a matter of obtaining the truth through good use of time. â€Å"Evil can be undone, but it cannot ‘develop’ into good. Time does not heal it† (Preface: VIII). Time is in essence, if perhaps used in the way of authentic leisure, a God given tool for overcoming evil and obtaining the truth of heaven. The women in chapter eleven loves her son so much that she has no love left to give and no room for love to be received. The spirit offers to open love to her, when she replies by requesting to see her son. This love has perhaps prevented her from receiving intellectus (receptivity of knowledge), and in my mother’s case, even the ratio (reasoning) is affected. The saying â€Å"love conquers all things† is true, even if it is not also conquering for the goo... ...tellectus. However, while painting in the ratio he noticed some things were more beautiful to paint than others. Ratio is what caused him to not enter through the gates of heaven. He had not preserved his intellectus or true beauty of things. He had lost intellectus through realization of time, of time slowing. So, instead of letting time go he grabbed it which brought him to reason his paintings through the mind rather than the spirit. â€Å"Reality never presents us with an absolutely unavoidable ‘either-or’; that, granted skill and patience and (above all) time enough, some way of embracing both alternatives can always be found† (Preface:VII). Lewis suggests here that time if spent right can bring us to self-realization of our journey, and in effect influence our choices. These choices are dependent on time. As wrong choices are made only in time, no truly rational choices can be made will out of the realm of time. Time is the evil that surrounds us. It is the letting go of this time when we truly feel void of problems. Only by letting go of our problems we will be able to communicate with God, while in the essence of being one with ourselves and finding our true inner self.